6 Comments
User's avatar
Micah Ansel's avatar

This is so good.

Expand full comment
Marcel Eschauzier | Zengineer's avatar

Interesting piece! And love the caduceus as the spine :)

Expand full comment
Geoff's avatar

I'm old enough now to see this is all completey true,there are no shortcuts

to this level of profound understanding.

I believe spiritual seeking can easily turn into the ultimate self betrayal, to even see that much is already a step in the right direction.

Expand full comment
Emma Macdonald's avatar

It’s a great article. It’s also cheapened and made disingenuous by using it as a tool to sell a program of any kind. :-(

Expand full comment
Atmos's avatar

Let’s drop the polite spiritual dance and hit the nerve you named. The so-called “disingenuous” taint you sense when a market critique sits next to a paid offer?

No denial here. I tackle this head-on in my first (free) Foundations audio: anyone selling sovereignty must expose the risk of selling new dependency, not dance around it.

Sovereignty isn’t shown by pretending contradiction doesn’t exist—it’s measured by whether the work breaks dependency or builds it. My programs aren’t bait for repeat seekers; they’re an exit ramp from the spiritual marketplace.

If “selling” itself becomes the problem, that only confirms how hungry this industry is to consume everything, including its reformers.

Every offer, free or paid, is a test: does it make you less dependent—on me or anyone else? If it doesn’t, I failed, and I’d be just another player in the game I came to end.

Expand full comment
Larry's avatar

I dig it

Expand full comment