Substack has hired a machine to score your humanity from 1 to 100. I have some feelings about this. And yes — you can feed it this very article to buy your way out.
"The tool cannot detect whether great human care went into the writing."
That is the phrase in Best's article that utterly destroys the whole reason to use Pangram.
And he mentions it as you mention the time of the day.
He says it out loud.
And he doesn't hear it.
That's exactly why they are so dishonest Hypocrites. I got zero tolerance for people who say the one thing and do the other.
Very well said !! 👏👏👏
I'm glad I'm not the only one pissed off by this. Great post!
🙏
Instead of slopware I read spyware and I was like…. Oohhh, something to dig into. 😂
"The tool cannot detect whether great human care went into the writing."
That is the phrase in Best's article that utterly destroys the whole reason to use Pangram.
And he mentions it as you mention the time of the day.
He says it out loud.
And he doesn't hear it.
That's exactly why they are so dishonest Hypocrites. I got zero tolerance for people who say the one thing and do the other.
Very well said !! 👏👏👏
I'm glad I'm not the only one pissed off by this. Great post!
🙏
Instead of slopware I read spyware and I was like…. Oohhh, something to dig into. 😂